← Back to Events

Timber Industry Files Lawsuits Challenging Cascade-Siskiyou Monument Expansion ↳ Part of Series

📅 March 1, 2017
📍 U.S. District Courts in Oregon and Washington, D.C.
Tags: Bureau of Land Management California Department of the Interior Federal Courts Legal Challenge Monument Expansion Pacific Northwest Timber/Logging
Inclusion Criteria: Legal Challenge or Ruling
At a Glance
📰 2 Sources
👥 4 People
Key individuals: Barack Obama, Ryan Zinke, Donald Trump

Description

Following President Obama's January 2017 expansion of the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument by over 70 percent to approximately 114,000 acres, three separate legal challenges emerged. Murphy Company (an Oregon timber firm), the Association of O&C Counties, and the American Forest Resource Council each filed federal lawsuits arguing that roughly 40,000 acres within the enlarged boundaries consisted of Oregon & California Revested Lands, which Congress designated in 1937 specifically for sustained-yield timber harvest. The plaintiffs contended that this congressional mandate superseded presidential authority under the Antiquities Act to prohibit commercial logging in the area. The litigation was stayed multiple times during 2017-2018 to allow Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke's monument review process to conclude. When the Trump administration failed to implement Zinke's recommendation to reduce the monument's size, the cases were reactivated in early 2018. Conservation organizations—including the Soda Mountain Wilderness Council, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, and Oregon Wild—intervened as defendants to protect the expansion. Ranchers operating within the monument also expressed concern about potential grazing restrictions, though the legal disputes centered on timber harvesting. In an unexpected development, Department of Justice attorneys representing the Trump administration filed motions in late 2018 defending the expansion's legality, aligning their arguments with the environmental intervenors. Government lawyers asserted that presidential authority under the Antiquities Act permitted the designation and that the O&C Act does not mandate timber production on every specific acre of covered lands. They further argued that the expansion decision fell within executive discretion and was not subject to judicial review. This position effectively defended a predecessor administration's conservation action despite the sitting president's expressed interest in reducing monument boundaries.

🔗 Related Events

Part of
📂 The Evolution and Legal Defense of Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument (2000–2024)
June 9, 2000
Also in this series (4)
Clinton Designates Cascade-Siskiyou as First National Monument Created to Protect Biodiversity Jun 9, 2000
President Obama Expands Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument via Proclamation 9564 Jan 12, 2017
Interior Secretary Zinke Recommends Reducing Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument Aug 24, 2017
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Cascade-Siskiyou Monument Cases, Ending Legal Challenges Mar 25, 2024

Sources (2)

Source: Other
Date: June 12, 2023
Read full article → https://westernlaw.org/defending-wildlands-protecting-public-lands-defending-cascade-siskiyou-national-monument-expansion-or-ca/
People Mentioned (1)
Witness 1
👤 Susan Jane Brown secondary Witness
Staff Attorney at Western Environmental Law Center
As an attorney for the Western Environmental Law Center, she represents conservation organizations (intervenors) actively defending the monument expansion against the timber industry lawsuits.
Source: Other
Date: December 13, 2018
Read full article → https://www.capitalpress.com/state/california/trump-administration-defends-cascade-siskiyou-expansion/article_0c0220ed-2720-5ad4-a88e-3af4b0b79b64.html
People Mentioned (3)
defendant 1
👤 Donald J. Trump primary defendant
President of the United States at U.S. Federal Government
As President, his administration, through Department of Justice attorneys, unexpectedly defended the Obama-era monument expansion in court despite the President's expressed interest in reducing monument boundaries.
investigator 1
👤 Ryan Zinke primary investigator
Interior Secretary at U.S. Department of the Interior
As Interior Secretary, he conducted a wide-ranging review of national monument designations, including Cascade-Siskiyou, and recommended shrinking its size, which led to stays in the litigation.
Signatory 1
👤 Barack Obama primary Signatory
President of the United States at U.S. Federal Government
As President, he signed the proclamation in January 2017 that expanded the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, which is the direct subject of the legal challenges.
📋

Why This Event Is Included

Legal Challenge or Ruling
LEGAL_ACTION
definitive
Lawsuits filed, court decisions issued, or legal proceedings affecting the status of protected areas.
Curator's Justification
This event is definitively a legal challenge. Three separate lawsuits were filed by timber interests (Murphy Company, Association of O&C Counties, American Forest Resource Council) challenging the monument expansion. The event describes the filing of complaints, legal arguments presented by both plaintiffs and government defendants, motions for summary judgment, and intervention by conservation groups. This matches the criterion's examples of 'industry suits challenging designations.' While BOUNDARY_CHANGE might seem applicable since an expansion is being challenged, the expansion itself occurred in January 2017 as a separate event - this event is about the legal response to that expansion. EXECUTIVE_REVIEW is background context (Zinke's review caused stays) but not the event's core focus.

Found an error or have additional information?

Help us maintain accuracy by submitting a challenge to this event.

🚩 Challenge This Event